<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>	<rss version="2.0"
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
	<channel>
		<title>Comments on: Goodbye, ancient theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336</link>
		<description>Chinalyst - China blogs in English-Your China Blog Community</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<generator>Drupal TotalFeeds Module</generator>
				
			<item>
		<title>Goodbye, ancient theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8881</link>
		<description>&lt;div class=&quot;bb-quote&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ã§Â¾Â½Ã¤Â¹â¹Ã¥Å Â© wrote:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;blockquote class=&quot;bb-quote-body&quot;&gt;Well, the Granite Studio blog posted an interesting article, giving a &lt;a href=&quot;http://botu.bokee.com/photodata/2006-5-29/000/534/433/1592781/1592781_h.jpg&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to a photo, which really makes all the difference.

Turns out the current building dates from around the 50&#039;s, after the Qing version of the burnt-down Ming theatre was bulldozed along with the city walls. Maybe the replacement will return to its roots.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

Certainly the surrounding area needs to come down, but even then, yes it&#039;s a bit grotty. I just hope they don&#039;t go for one of those ultra-modern styles - they&#039;re so tacky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="bb-quote"><b>Ã§Â¾Â½Ã¤Â¹â¹Ã¥Å Â© wrote:</b><br />
<blockquote class="bb-quote-body">Well, the Granite Studio blog posted an interesting article, giving a <a href="http://botu.bokee.com/photodata/2006-5-29/000/534/433/1592781/1592781_h.jpg" class="bb-url" rel="nofollow">link</a> to a photo, which really makes all the difference.</blockquote></div>
<p>Turns out the current building dates from around the 50's, after the Qing version of the burnt-down Ming theatre was bulldozed along with the city walls. Maybe the replacement will return to its roots.</p>

<p>Certainly the surrounding area needs to come down, but even then, yes it's a bit grotty. I just hope they don't go for one of those ultra-modern styles - they're so tacky.</p>]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:36:00 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Unknown</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8881</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye, ancient theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8880</link>
		<description>Well, the Granite Studio blog posted an interesting article, giving a &lt;a href=&quot;http://botu.bokee.com/photodata/2006-5-29/000/534/433/1592781/1592781_h.jpg&quot; class=&quot;bb-url&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt; to a photo, which really makes all the difference.

Turns out the current building dates from around the 50&#039;s, after the Qing version of the burnt-down Ming theatre was bulldozed along with the city walls. Maybe the replacement will return to its roots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Granite Studio blog posted an interesting article, giving a <a href="http://botu.bokee.com/photodata/2006-5-29/000/534/433/1592781/1592781_h.jpg" class="bb-url" rel="nofollow">link</a> to a photo, which really makes all the difference.</p>
<p>Turns out the current building dates from around the 50's, after the Qing version of the burnt-down Ming theatre was bulldozed along with the city walls. Maybe the replacement will return to its roots.</p>]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 02:15:42 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Unknown</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8880</guid>
							</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye, ancient theatre</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8879</link>
		<description>&amp;quot;New&amp;quot; isn&#039;t always better. Tokyo&#039;s Kabuki-za is the same as it has always been - it&#039;s a great venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;New&quot; isn't always better. Tokyo's Kabuki-za is the same as it has always been - it's a great venue.</p>]]></content:encoded>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 19:25:56 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Unknown</dc:creator>
		<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.chinalyst.net/node/13336%2523comment-8879</guid>
							</item>
		</channel>
	</rss>
	