什么是对�京大屠�的最好纪念?

Submitted by panzi on Fri, 2006-04-07 21:15. ::
 

Here are is a piece of Chinese prose for those who are struggling with Chinese.

�京屠�是买办亡国的一个典型例�.1927年�,由于江浙���两大财团和蒋介石政�的结�,买办�展为官僚买办资产阶级,�但控制了全国的�济命脉,而且掌�了军政大�。1927年的蒋政�是个买办和大地主��执政的政�,而1940年汪伪政�已�完全�为彻底的买办政�了,伪中央政治会议的30�委员大部分是买办。这时买办对�国主义武力掠夺的最好�务就是�抵抗主义和投�,他们得到的利益就是继续掌�。

对于1927年到1937年这段时间,被买办和帮闲文人们美化为“黄金å??å¹´â€?。在这å??年里,一次次外敌入侵,一年年国土沦丧,没有一天å?œæ­¢è¿‡å†…战。虽然军费一直å? æ”¿åºœæ”¯å‡ºçš„80%,但是中国军队的装备å?´æ²¡æœ‰ä»»ä½•实质的进步。中国ä»?ç„¶ä¸?能独立设计和制造国防需è¦?的飞机ã€?å?¦å…‹ã€?é‡?炮。“黄金å??å¹´â€?竟是以å?—京大屠æ?€å’Œæ°‘æ—?å?±äº¡ä¸ºç»“局的。(对比1949-59è¿™10å¹´,解放军从几乎纯步兵,å?‘展到拥有3000架最先进的喷气战斗机,å’Œ100多个现代化师的现代军队,以å?Šèƒ½ç”Ÿäº§å–·æ°”飞机,T59å?¦å…‹å’Œå?„型大炮的国防工业).

1937å¹´çš„å?—京首都ä¿?å?«æˆ˜,以å?¸ä»¤å”?生智的ä¸?战而逃开始,国军的溃败和投é™?和日军的大屠æ?€ä¸ºç»“å±€.这是中国历å?²ä¸Šçš„奇耻大辱.我们ä¸?能怪敌人残å¿?, 因为ç§?æ—?ç?­ç»?贯穿人类历å?², 把希望寄托在敌人的ä»?慈上是å?¯ç¬‘çš„.å¹´å¹´æ?žä»€ä¹ˆçºªå¿µå°±æ›´æ˜¯TMD自露伤疤的å?˜æ€?娘们儿å?šæ´¾,有ç§?象米国人那样在日本烧æ?€å¥¸æ·«,æ— æ?¶ä¸?å?š,还外带两棵核弹让敌人å“?å°?被ç§?æ—?ç?­ç»?çš„æ??惧感,结果是当今日本彻底阳è?Žæˆ?了米国床上死心塌地的二奶.

与其纪念å?—京屠æ?€, ä¸?如纪念æœ?鲜战争中的志愿军英雄, 简陋的步兵武器在一群男å­?汉手中æˆ?了WMD,把米国人从鸭绿江赶回了38线. 在第二次战役中38军的步兵推进速度, 比91年米军在科å¨?特的机械化推进速度还快.日本人å?‚拜阵亡军人的神社, 那是缅怀曾ç»?是男人的自己, 被米国人亡了国,男人也就ä¸?是真正的男人了.正因如此,尽管里é?¢ä¾›çš„大部分是和米军作战阵亡军人,怎么没è§?米国人å??对?

而我们是年å¤?一年的å?‘米国的二奶抱怨, "你当年还没被米国阉了的时候居然强暴了我,WU...WU...WU, ä½ å??,ä½ è¦?承认你å??." è¿™TMD根本就是把自己当æˆ?了争宠的å°?妾,而ä¸?是顶天立地的男å­?汉.

对中国的男人�说,最好的纪念,应该在�年的冬天,最寒冷最阴�的一个早晨,背上一支步枪去无人的旷野里跑上20公里,�需�说什么,也�需�修什么纪念馆,在冰天雪地的旷野中亲身体验一下当年志愿军英雄们在清�江,长津湖的豪情,牺牲和壮烈,是比任何言语和文字都更深刻的对�京屠�的纪念. 一代人有一代人的使命,50年�的男�汉们以巨大的牺牲完�了把中国从民��亡和�京屠�中挽救回�的使命,我们这一代应该�的是实现中国的伟大�兴, 把米国这黑�大,目�世界的癌症和万�之�打翻,�上一�脚,让其永世�得翻身. SHOW tothe world, We are the justice and the master, �把日本这女人(已被米国净身)收为我们的二奶. (统一�的韩国为正房,也需�动点整容净身手术).

*** 米国是万�之�, 买办是亡国之祸 ***

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2006-04-07 22:14.
panzi wrote:
Here are is a piece of Chinese prose for those who are struggling with Chinese.

Now why would you want to post something in prose for people who are struggling with Chinese?

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Fri, 2006-04-07 22:25.

That's a question for the times.

nausicaa
Submitted by nausicaa on Sat, 2006-04-08 02:06.

Hell, I’m bored. I translated panzi’s essay for y’alls edification.

“What is the best way to commemorate the Nanjing Massacre?�

The Nanjing Massacre is a classic example of death-by-compradors. After 1927, due to the intergration of the Chiang Kai-shek regime with the powerful Jiangzhe and Huanan financial groups, compradors became the bureaucrat-cum-comprador capitalist class, and not only controlled the economic pulse of the nation, but also held the power of the military. The Chiang regime of 1927 was a regime where compradors and big landlords collaborated to rule, but the Wangwei regime of 1940 was a regime completely under comprador rule; the majority of the 30 members of Wei’s Central Political Conference were compradors. At this time, imperialist exploitation was well served by the their capitulation to it, and the benefit they received was the continuance of their rule.

The period between 1927 and 1937 is glamourised by compradors and lackey intellectuals as the “ten golden years�. These ten years saw repeated invasions by foreign enemies and the continual degradation of the land, and not a day passed without civil conflict. Although military expenditure had always accounted for 80% of the government’s budget, the arsenal of China’s armed forces did not see any substantial improvement. China was still not able to independently design and construct the airplanes, tanks, and heavy cannons needed for national security. The “ten golden years� actually culminated in the Nanjing Massacre and ethnic peril. ( Compare with the ten years between 1949 and 1959, where the PLA went from being nearly all infantry to having 3000 of the most advanced jetfighters and 100 more modernized troops, as well as having the industries capable of producing jetfighters, T59 tanks, and various heavy cannons.)

The defensive battle in 1937 of the Nanjing capital began with the fleeing of Commander Tang Shenzhi before battle had even started, and ended with the route and surrender of the national army, and the massacre by the Japanese army. This is the great shame of China’s history. We can’t blame the enemy for being cruel, because genocide runs throughout human history, and to place hope on the enemy’s kindness is laughable. To do some kind of commemoration year after year is, dammit, baring the wound like screwed-up women. Have balls and be like America: burn and kill, rape and pillage Japan, and to add to it drop two atom bombs to let the enemy taste the horror of genocide - the result of which is that today’s Japan is completely impotent and has become the slavish mistress on America’s bed.

Rather than commemorate the Nanjing Massacre, we should commemorate the heroes of the volunteer army during the Korean Conflict; the crudely simple weapons of footsoldiers became in the hands of a bunch of brave men WMD, kicking Americans from Yalu River all the way the 38th parallel. In the second campaign, the infantry of the 38th Army quickened their speed, and was even faster than the Americans were in Kuwait in ’91 with their technologized advance. The Japanese pay respects to those who died in battle at shrines – that’s to remember their selves who had once been men. America has destroyed their country, and so the men are no longer true men. It’s precisely because of this, that even though most of those enshrined were soldiers who had died doing battle with American troops, why we haven’t seen Americans protest.

And yet year after year we whine to America’s mistress: “Back in the day when America hasn’t yet castrated you, you went so far as to violently assault me, waaaahhh, you’re awful. Admit that you’re awful!� Dammit, this is is basically treating yourself as a concubine vying for favours, and not as a man capable of holding up the sky and founding the land.

To China’s men, the best way to commemorate is to do this: on the coldest and most dismal day of every winter, sling a rifle over your shoulder and go run 20 kilometers on a vast, deserted field. No need to say anything, no need to built some kind of memorial, but under the icy sky and in the snowy fields personally experience a bit the spirit, sacrifice, and heroism of the erstwhile volunteer army heroes at Qingchuan River. For a commemoration of Nanjing Massacre, it’s better than any talk or words. Every generation has its mission. 50 years ago, brave men through colossal sacrifice completed their mission of rescuing China from the brink of ethnic extermination and out of the Nanjing Massacre. What our generation should do is fulfill China’s great restoration by overthrowing America this head mafioso, the cancer of our current world and the source of all evils, and grind one foot down, so it can never get back up. Then take Japan (who has already been “gelded� by America) for our mistress. (Korea after unification will be our wife propre, and also needs a little plastic surgery and a little “gelding�.)

**
ETA: Whew. That was a waste of 30 minutes. Have fun.

t_co
Submitted by t_co on Sat, 2006-04-08 04:37.

Hahahahhaa.... cough cough hahhhhhhha.... aha... aha.... *gasp* *choke*

Man I haven't laughed this hard since Michael Jackson was still black.

Panzi, you do realize that this is the kind of shit that ends up getting used by Art Waldron and his band of Blue Team loonies to argue for listing China as America's No. 1 enemy, right? Here's a hint for you, patriot: Don't give your enemies excuses to raise their defense budgets against you by talking about your hate; keep it in and ACT if you will, but don't be like Frank Pentangeli...

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2006-04-08 05:50.
nausicaa wrote:
ETA: Whew. That was a waste of 30 minutes. Have fun.

That's why I didn't bother.

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Sat, 2006-04-08 07:17.

panzi, get some action, u need it. (sex)

Richard
Submitted by Richard on Sat, 2006-04-08 07:22.

Oh dear. And here I always thought America helped China against the Japanese. Thanks to Panzi for the history lesson. Death to America! (For the dense, I am being as sarcastic as I possibly can.)

nausicaa
Submitted by nausicaa on Sat, 2006-04-08 07:41.

To THM: Well, I wanted to share the wealth with the other Ducklings. It's no fun just laughing by myself.

I have to add, though, that panzi is a nutsoid and not representative of China's netizens at all. A lot of the posters over at ccforum or the politics section of Hexun are much saner than this.

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2006-04-08 08:03.
nausicaa wrote:
To THM: Well, I wanted to share the wealth with the other Ducklings. It's no fun just laughing by myself.

Oh, believe me, I was laughing too! :lol:

Quote:
I have to add, though, that panzi is a nutsoid and not representative of China's netizens at all.

That goes without saying! :wink:

Other Lisa
Submitted by Other Lisa on Sat, 2006-04-08 08:45.

I'm using my crappy Chinese to 1. Translate the lesson for tomorrow's class and 2. Translate Nina's (Wu Na's) blog about her brother, Hao. No, I am not the talented and dedicated person providing translations for freehaowu. org. My Chinese isn't nearly good enough. But given that it takes me a fair amount of time to read Chinese, I try to read things that are meaningful.

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 10:19.

"1937年的�京首都��战,以�令�生智的�战而逃开始,国军的溃败和投�和日军的大屠�为结局.这是中国历�上的奇耻大辱."

That's a load of horse wash and you know it. This isn't history, its propoganda.

May I suggest that you read a quality account of events by western writters, there's an awful lot more to it than that. Even Japanese text books are more forgivving to the NAtionalists than you are, and that's saying something.

我们�能怪敌人残�, 因为����贯穿人类历�,

Really, Xinhua daily does this every day.

Maybe you should read the a foreign history book.

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 10:23.

Panzi, since you speak English, and well know that half of the people on this baord can't speak Chinese. Wouldn't it have been easier for you to write this in English yourself?

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Sun, 2006-04-09 11:19.
ACB wrote:
Panzi, since you speak English, and well know that half of the people on this baord can't speak Chinese. Wouldn't it have been easier for you to write this in English yourself?

ACB: you've totally missed the point. Panzi wrote in Chinese because the essay is meant to be for commenters on the Duckpond who are originally from Chinese background. They are what he referred to as "compradore" or 买办. It's not really that subtle, ACB. You need to brush up on your Chinese.

This is another example of what a sad case Panzi is. In his fantasy world, everything is black and white. You are either Chinese or you are foreigners. Anything in between is bad. So compradores are bad because they are Chinese who work for foreigners....bla, bla, bla.....

So ACB, I'm wondering how Panzi would classify someone like you?
:wink:

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 11:44.
Quote:
Panzi wrote in Chinese because the essay is meant to be for commenters on the Duckpond who are originally from Chinese background.

Of whom there are but a handful. No, I think that Panzi wrote in Chinese because he could, and because he knew that half of the readers couldn't. It's a power game.

Quote:
So ACB, I'm wondering how Panzi would classify someone like you?

The phrase 漢奸 springs to mind.

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Sun, 2006-04-09 11:58.
ACB wrote:
Quote:
I think that Panzi wrote in Chinese because he could, and because he knew that half of the readers couldn't. It's a power game.

Yes, more than possible. But then the power game didn't work on me. What a pity! I'm thicker than he can handle. That's why Zhuangzi said that it's good to be stupid and useless. Or did Bo La Tu said that??? :?

ACB wrote:
Quote:
So ACB, I'm wondering how Panzi would classify someone like you?

The phrase 漢奸 springs to mind.

Then Panzi is wrong. You are not Chinese, surely.

nausicaa
Submitted by nausicaa on Sun, 2006-04-09 13:08.

Yeah, what Fat Cat said. "Comprador" is basically codeword for 漢奸 . Panzi wants to shame us seller-outers into running the 20k carrying a rifle for Glorious China, I guess. Heh heh heh.

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 14:55.
Quote:
Then Panzi is wrong. You are not Chinese, surely.

I'm not ethnically Han, and I don't call myself 'Chinese' when I'm on the mainland, if that's what you mean.

In Panzi's thinking, you need to be pure Han and to be mainland to be 'true Chinese' else you are contaminated and less than Chinese. And you need to support the government in everything that it does else you are 漢奸. Thinking for yourself is sedition in his book.

I bet that he spits when hears the words 'overseas Chinese', and vomits when he hears people calling themselves 'Chinese-American'.

Panzi is the Chinese version of a white supremisist.

Sojourner
Submitted by Sojourner on Sun, 2006-04-09 17:49.
Quote:
I bet that he spits when hears the words 'overseas Chinese' ...

I was under the impression panzi was overseas Chinese. Certainly, the most fascist and xenophobic posts I read from Chinese on this blog and others are written by Chinese living in the USA, Britain, Singapore, etc.

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Sun, 2006-04-09 18:01.

Is that right? Not chinese on the mainland?

The xenophobes must have difficult lives since they cannot adjust to life outside China.

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 19:53.

OK, now it is time for the phychobable.

lightyear wrote:
The xenophobes must have difficult lives since they cannot adjust to life outside China.

Sadly, a lot of these angry 'overseas Chinese' aren't really Chinese in any meaningful way, except by ethnicity.

A lot are 2+ generation foreigners with Chinese ancestory, who can only speak pigeon Mandarin or Cantonese (they know only the most common words, and they have funny foreign accents on their tones etc that make them difficult for mainlanders to understand) and are only semi-literate in writing Chinese, if they know it at all. They can read some and Chinese write using a PC, but can't remember the strokes to write by hand.

They often come from parents who fled from China or HK to avoid the communists or to escape poverty. Their parents maintain enough of their traditions to make their children aware that they are different from the local population, but not enough to make them 'properly Chinese'.

They are caught between two differen tcultures difference (one culture at home, one at school) but belong to neither and they look different form the locals too, whcih has a disasosiative effect on them, and makes it hard for them to relate directly to anybody Chinese or western

As a result, they commonly feel angry at the world, and have a tendency to lash out or to equate anything that they don't like to a purposeful effort to 'keep them down' by other people (an angry young loner syndrom).

This disasotiation with the world around them leads them to want to be a part of something bigger, and to cling to something that they feel is strong. Often, this is their Chinese heritage.

The try to become 'more Chinese than the Chinese', but they have this idealized view of China as being a pefect place that is being 'kept down' by outsiders just like feel that they are being 'kept down' by society around them. And they either see the nationalist or the communists (it often doesn't matter which. For example, many of the strongest pro-Taiwanese independence capaigners are 2+ generation Chinese-Americans) as being the 'true way forward'.

Out of all this anger, and the desire to be ultra Chinese, you get somebody like Panzi.

Equally, it is not unknown to get Mainlanders who go to study in the West, who can't cope with the social differences.

Half of these people go nuts, and burn out through too much partying and excess because they want to try everything, and the other half turn into fenquing.

Those who turn ultra nationalist usually come form strict backgrounds and are unable to adjust to the more liberal western society. They have trouble fitting in, and rather than seeing this as being a result of themselves being unable to 'lighten up' they turn against the society that is around them and accuse it of being debased and corrupt.

They can't stand Chinese and overseas-Chinese who natrualized or who fit in in the west. They call them traitors, and they feel the need to become ultra hardline Chinese in order to fend off any corrupting influences that they may encounter.

Ironically, many of them covet the lifestyle that they can have in the west, with its widescreen HDTVs and fast cars, and they don't want to go back living in a towerblock in Beijing, even if it is a nice tower block.

As a result, they not only hate the world around them, but they also hate themselves for secretly wanting to be a part of it and they use ultra nationalism to rationalize this hatred.

Insidentally, many of them are also unable to adapt to life back in China, and feel that they have been robbed of what they had in the west, even if they hated it when they were there.

As Panzi says that America is worse than Japan, it is obvious that he's not a Mainlander, I think that he's probably 2nd generation Chinese America and that it was probably his grandfather who moved to the west, rather than his father.

panzi
Submitted by panzi on Sun, 2006-04-09 21:01.

ACB, you must be talking about yourself, as I myself am by no means 'caught' between two cultures. I am a native-born Chinese. Those so called ABC's are actually the pathetic losers. They don't know anything about Chinese culture, and yet do not fit in the Western society. They dream everyday of having white skin, and think that their lives are a success if they went to "Harvard" or "Yale" and became a doctor, or a investment banker, devoting their whole lives to serving their Anglo genocidist masters.

ACB, are you one of those losers? What are you doing in Shanghai? Working in some American investment bank as a pathetic "quant"?

ACB
Submitted by ACB on Sun, 2006-04-09 22:19.
panzi wrote:
They dream everyday of having white skin

For somebody who critisizes it so often, you don't seem to know much about western culture. Whites consider tanned skin to be a sign of good health. It means that you have the wealth to sit around in the sun all day or the strength to play sports outside. Having a pale skin in the west means that you are either a poor slob forced to spend all their days working in an office or a factors out of the sun, or that you are too sick to play sports outside.

Asians in the US have a skin tone from birth that white pay hundred of dollars to get in a salon.

Quote:
and think that their lives are a success if they went to "Harvard" or "Yale" and became a doctor, or a investment banker

Statistically, college attendence per 100 head of Asian-Ameircans is higher than among white-Americans, or so I believe. The percentage of small business ownership is high too.

Thing have even reached the stage when Asian civil right groups have started to complain that US TV automatically depicts Asians as being highly educated lawyers, doctors, accountant and scientists, rather than as blue colar workers.

Quote:
ACB, are you one of those losers? What are you doing in Shanghai? Working in some American investment bank as a pathetic "quant"?

'quant'? I'm sure I don't know what you mean.

I don't do anything quite so trivial as help the west feed off of China's risig star. I'm the other kind of analyst, and I most certainly don't work for the Americans.

I'm also not Chinese-America.

nausicaa
Submitted by nausicaa on Mon, 2006-04-10 00:54.
Quote:
For somebody who critisizes it so often, you don't seem to know much about western culture. Whites consider tanned skin to be a sign of good health. It means that you have the wealth to sit around in the sun all day or the strength to play sports outside. Having a pale skin in the west means that you are either a poor slob forced to spend all their days working in an office or a factors out of the sun, or that you are too sick to play sports outside.

Exactly. And many of those Chinese who whiten their skin aren't necessarily doing it because they're fetishizing Caucasians, but because white skin has traditionally been considered as a sign of the upper class. (you know, like one of those 大家闺秀of antiquity who sat in their parlors and never chanced into the sunlight.)

I love how according to panzi wanting to become a doctor is apparently serving the Anglo-genocidists.

He probably comes from a similar background to mine. Raised in China, and came to the West in his pre-teens or teens.

And sorry, ACB, but you don't get to be called 汉奸. Only we get such an honourific. If you really, really feel strongly about it though, I guess I, nausicaa, a Chinese (heh, I bet that sure annoys the tits off of panzi), can hereby dub you, ACB, a Chinese. Presto! Now you can be called 汉奸.

t_co
Submitted by t_co on Mon, 2006-04-10 02:50.

Being someone who came to America when I was twelve and left when I was 22, I can say that Panzi reminds me of those Asian guys at my high school who were beaten by their parents every day for not getting perfect scores on all their tests... AND didn't get into the Ivy League because they couldn't write an English essay for the life of them.

I also remember being called a "coolie" for taking a white girl to prom by a kid like him--and then the kid's date (a proper Chinese girl) got snatched by my best friend (who was white). The kid then got suspended for threatening to knife my friend... and got beaten by his parents... heheh... good times.

Seriously, racist divides are really, really old and cloud your judgment by closing off what should be optimal choices; why do you still cling to them? Panzi, just open up, it's ok to be pissed off about what happened to your country before, but don't let that past emotion dominate your present life...

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Mon, 2006-04-10 04:37.

First of all, a big applause for all three of you, ACB, nausicca and t_co. I totally agree with your analysis. I'm not at all sorry about stirring up this storm. At first I meant to put myself out for Panzi to wet his pants and then turn around and tell him what an idiot he is. But then you guys have done it so beautifully. Many thanks. Just one thought though:

ACB wrote:
For somebody who critisizes it so often, you don't seem to know much about western culture.

ACB my friend, I think that this is a brilliant insight into Panzi. May I make one suggestion: Panzi is a native Chinese who is trapped in Japan, not in America. That explains his hatred for the country which he couldn't fit in. It also explains why he is blogging here because deep down in his heart, he wants to be in America and so he is gealous of those Chinese migrants who are doing well in the US. His obsession with having "white skin" very much reflect a sense of Japanese asthetics.

Oh dear Panzi, you are such a sad case. I almost feel sorry for you. But then don't get your hope so high. I don't fancy you. You are not my type.

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Mon, 2006-04-10 05:06.

Panzi, what do you do for a living? Work in China for a Chinese company? Good for you. Odds are the company is learning a ton from its western competitors or allies in terms of process, strategy, financing, and marketing, given the CCP set the country and its privatized institutions back fifty years.

Or, maybe you work for an SOE?

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Mon, 2006-04-10 05:37.
lightyear wrote:
Panzi,....Or, maybe you work for an SOE?

What's "Secret Of Evermore" got to do with anything here? You are not seriously suggesting that Panzi sells Nintendo games in China for a living .... or unless you mean THAT SOE .... Oh! I'm scared.

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Mon, 2006-04-10 06:58.

By the way, Panzi's essay can also be found at the Brown University Chinese Students and Scholars Association Discussion Forum. The author called himself "Chemistry". But then the actually posting itself bares a name "Panzerfaust". The link: http://www.brownchina.org/bbs/read.php?tid=142&fpage=5

Just a word of warning for the faint-hearted: there are lots of scary and xenophobic stuff under 时事论� (current affairs forum). They are all written in Chinese. More than half of them are posted by this Chemistry character. So it looks as if the Duckpond is not the only place frequented by this troll.

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Mon, 2006-04-10 07:00.

I meant SOE as state owned enterprise.

Fat Cat
Submitted by Fat Cat on Mon, 2006-04-10 07:11.
lightyear wrote:
I meant SOE as state owned enterprise.

Oh! Is that so? Are you sure you don't mean "Special Operations Executives"?

Ivan
Submitted by Ivan on Mon, 2006-04-10 07:48.

Oy! Panzi, malenkii malenkii malchyk, ty kak YUbka! Daaaa, panzi, yubka moyaaa, ya lyubyu tebya! U vas yest yubka, panzi, lastochka moya?

Liu Yixi
Submitted by Liu Yixi on Wed, 2006-04-12 23:43.

I would like to see an imitate Panzi composition contest hosted on this website. Points would be awarded for 1.) unoriginality
2.) repetition 3.) illogic 4.) racially based insults.

lightyear
Submitted by lightyear on Thu, 2006-04-13 04:31.

Sounds fun. What's the topic!?

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2006-04-22 22:09.

Deleted - sorry everyone, but this guy is banned

t_co
Submitted by t_co on Sat, 2006-05-06 19:39.

Just a question for Richard: of the following trolls, which of them have common IP addresses?
MAJ (he's on the memberlist)
HELLO321
panzi
Math (although he's less inflammatory than the others, I'll admit)
The_Observer

RajGB
Submitted by RajGB on Sat, 2006-05-06 22:02.
HELLO321 wrote:
However, I can tell ya there are a lot more Panzis around these days than meets the eye. A good sign, I would say.

Were you dropped on the head as a child? Or did your parents just do a completely half-arsed job in raising you?

The Iron Buddha
Submitted by The Iron Buddha on Sun, 2006-05-07 03:57.
Quote:
China is China. It has its own way of thinking, just like Americans, or Russians, or Koreans do

The Nazis had their own way of thinking. So did imperial Japan and the Khemer Rouge. That doesn't mean that their right or should be supported.

RajGB
Submitted by RajGB on Sun, 2006-05-07 12:47.
The Iron Buddha wrote:
Quote:
China is China. It has its own way of thinking, just like Americans, or Russians, or Koreans do

The Nazis had their own way of thinking. So did imperial Japan and the Khemer Rouge. That doesn't mean that their right or should be supported.

Nice comparison! 8)